Simgot EW200: Absolutely Insane for only $40

Pros

  • Very well built 
  • Complete set of accessories 
  • Tight, well controlled, punchy bass 
  • Clean lower midrange
  • Very forward and engaging upper midrange 
  • Very sparkly and energetic treble  
  • Decently smooth treble
  • Good treble extension
  • Impressive technicalities 

Cons
  • Shell is a fingerprint magnet
  • Lower midrange lacks a bit of lushness
  • Upper midrange can get a bit shouty sometimes
  • Note weight and density is a bit light 
  • Treble can be slightly too harsh to some 


Disclaimer
  • Huge thanks to Simgot for providing the opportunity for me to review the EW200. I really do appreciate it. However, all thoughts and opinions are my own, and are not influenced in any way. 
  • Please take this review with only a grain of salt, as everyone's hearing, fit, and gears may differ, so our experience may be different.

Price(MSRP)
  • $39.99

Source(s)
  • Truthear Shio
  • FiiO KA13
  • Jcally JM6 Pro
Ear tips
  • Dunu S&S
  • Acoustune AET07

Packaging
  • EW200.
  • Soft carrying pouch 
    • Very good inclusion, very practical to use as well.
  • 3 pairs of genetic silicone ear tips (S, M, L)
  • Silver-Plated OFC Cable
    • Comfortable, lightweight, and not too thin either. 
    • Tangles a little sometimes, but not the worst.









Build Quality
  • Full metal finish, very solid and sturdy build. 

Fit
  • Nozzle has average width and length.
  • Fit was alright, not the most comfortable fit ever due to its weight. 
  • I also don't have the deepest fit for it, maybe it is due to the shell blocking it.



Tonality

  • Harman 

Bass
  • Sub bass is slightly more prominent than the mid bass. 
  • Sub bass is present and they do rumble, just don't expect it to be very deep.
  • Mid bass is slightly less present than sub bass, slams isn't particularly hard and isn't very well bodied, but they are fairly punchy and textured. 
  • The bass presentation is also really snappy and very well controlled.
  • Quantity should be sufficient if you're not a basshead or if you're not into very thick bass. 
  • Overall, the bass is satisfying enough to my ears and definitely is good enough for something in this price range without any major compromises. 

Midrange
  • Lower midrange is quite clean with a touch of warmth. 
    • Male vocals sound decent, doesn't sound particularly lush and forward but it is not overly thin and pushed back either.
  • Upper midrange is very energetic but is smooth. 
    • Female vocals sound very engaging and forward, but can potentially be shouty and overly forward. 
  • Instruments and timbre is decently natural, but upper region is a bit brighter while lower region is a bit dry, so it can get very energetic on the upper end. 
  • Due to the thinner lower midrange and the brightness of the upper midrange and treble, the overall note weight is noticeably on the lighter side.

Treble
  • Treble is definitely on the bright and sparkly side, which adds some crispiness to cymbals and notes.
  • Can be slightly too harsh and fatiguing to some.
  • Treble is quite smooth as well, no major spikes and peaks throughout my listening experience.
  • Treble is also well extended, which is a little surprising for a single DD IEM in this price range, giving a nice airy feeling to the overall treble presentation but not overdone in any way.
  • Details can be perceived fairly easily due to the bright nature of treble.


Technicalities

Resolution
  • Resolution and detail retrieval is excellent for the price, can even rival certain DD IEMs that are priced nearly twice the price tag, such as the Moondrop Aria. 
Soundstage
  • Staging is decently wide, but not really deep or tall.
  • I would say is good enough for something in this price bracket, but not very outstanding. 
  • However, it is not cramped or intimate by any means. 

Imaging
  • Imaging and accuracy is razor sharp for the price, I am able track and pinpoint where the sound is coming from  precisely with ease.
Separation
  • Separation and layering is good. Instruments and vocals is well separated among each other.
  • Even in busier tracks, the EW200 handles it really well, without sounding congested at all. 



Comparison 

Simgot EW200 vs EPZ Q5






  • Accessories: 
    • The Q5 easily provides more and better accessories compared to the EW200
      • Main difference being:
        • Extra set of ear tips  
        • Higher quality, semi-hard case 
        • Extra cleaning cloth
  • Others:
    • The Q5 box is a lot bigger, offering a more much more "premium" unboxing experience if that is your sort of thing.
    • The Q5 MMCX connector offers a really bad experience in my case, and the EW200 uses the usual 2 pin connector which I am very used to, which I did not encounter any issues.

  • Bass: 
    • Q5 has better sub bass extension, providing a slightly deeper sub bass rumble.
    • Although both bass are tight, well controlled and snappy, the Q5's bass has a better slam, definition, texture and speed.
    • Overall, I enjoyed the bass on the Q5 a bit more, but both are not bad by any means.
  • Midrange: 
    • Both have similar presentations, slightly thin lower midrange paired with a very energetic but smooth upper midrange which could be shouty to some. 
  • Treble: 
    • Q5 carries more energy particularly in the lower treble region (4-6k), which ultimately adds sibilance to a lot of higher pitched female vocals during my listening experience. 
    • Meanwhile, EW200 tones it down a little, cuts down a ton of sibilance for me but retains the overall brightness and energy. 
    • Both have similarly decent treble extension, providing a airy but still natural tone to it.

  • Technicalities: 
    • While both are technically impressive for the price, I would give it to the Q5 for having better staging, resolution and speed. 
    • This could be due to the bump in the lower treble region, which could give a boost in clarity, or could also be the difference in driver used.

  • Overall, based on my own preference, I would pick the EW200 which offers a similar tonality and close enough technical chops compared to the Q5, but with a huge cut in sibilance which I am particularly sensitive to. However, if you're not sensitive to sibilance and treble, I would say that the Q5 offers a better package as a whole and slight edge in technicalities. 



Conclusion
  • As a conclusion, I think that the Simgot EW200 performs WAY above its price point, and it could potentially even rival IEMs under $100 in terms of tonality, technicalities, and even build quality. 
  • The EW200 is an easy recommendation for people who are looking for a clean, bright signature with as little compromise as possible, such as accessories and build quality as well.
  • However, if you prefer a more warm and relaxing signature, or a more unique, non-Harman signature, then the EW200 is not for you.  




Non Affiliated Link
  • If you are interested after reading the article, feel free to check out the non affiliated link below.








Thanks for reading!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Truthear Nova: Good, solid ... but awkward timing and price

SeeAudio x Z Review Rinko: 完全不一樣的SeeAudio調音風格!

Juzear Clear: Budget Bass Canon that comes with a Premium Cable